วันศุกร์ที่ 29 กรกฎาคม พ.ศ. 2559

The Bona Dea Scandal of 62 BC and its Ramification (Part 2 – Battle of the Two Nemeses)

The Death of Clodius
Last time, we left off where Caesar has craftily gained the loyalty of Clodius through his feigned ignorance of the Bona Dea scandal, and Cicero’s plight at the prospect of making a formidable foe out of Clodius through his tireless prosecution of the latter.  Nor was it helpful to Cicero that he now antagonised Caesar in another separate trial of Gaius Antonius.
Antonius, at the intimation and support of Cicero, was given the governorship of Macedonia. During his governorship, he inflicted many injuries on the territory and extorted the inhabitants. For this, he was eventually charged with extortion and incompetence to govern his province. Cicero, despite his best defence of Antonius, was despondent when Antonius was convicted in March 59 BC for his participation in the Cataline conspiracy (more about that later). In his outrage, Cicero unwisely attacked Caesar, accusing him of influencing the trial outcome. Caesar was enraged. He now sought to put Cicero in his place, and what better way to do it than enlisting the help of his lackey, Clodius, Cicero’s bitter enemy?
Clodius, ousted from the Senate by the prosecution Cicero brought against him, was still nursing an undying hatred for the orator. He wanted to become a Tribune, a very powerful post, so that he could take revenge directly on Cicero. However, there is one obstacle – the law forbade a patrician like Clodius from being elected a Tribune. Caesar, seeing the opportunity, enlisted the help of his supporter, the Tribune Herennius, convincing him to adopt Clodius into his family thereby making him a ‘pleb’ – a process known as “transition ad plebem”. Despite Cicero’s tireless objection and savage criticism, the Senate allowed the adoption after several months of deliberations. Having discarded his patrician status, Clodius was free to become a Tribune and unleash his anger on his nemesis. To add insult to the injury, Herennius was much younger than Clodius, and Cicero bitterly commented that “the man who has adopted [Clodius] as your father might…have been your son”. No matter how much the lamentation and grievance Cicero might have felt, an undeniable fact is that Clodius was now unstoppable.
To add to Cicero’s nightmare, Clodius was elected Tribune of the Plebs in October 58 BC. This powerful post would give Clodius power to propose laws and manage the closing of Senate sessions. Most importantly, Clodius was not vested with the power to ‘veto’ the motions of other senators or other Tribunes! Here was the tool both Caesar and Clodius would exploit against Cicero. After all, the Duo desired the same thing: to see Cicero humiliated and discredited. That a stubborn, wanton and spiteful man like Clodius was willing to place himself at Caesar’s service demonstrated how much grievance and animosity he had against Cicero. Indeed, as expounded by Dio, one of Cicero’s greatest shortcomings was that he often “made for himself bitter enemies by always striving to get the better of even the most powerful men and by employing an unbridled and excessive frankness of speech toward all alike”. Nothing could be truer!
With his departure to Gaul approaching, Clodius became ever more crucial to Caesar’s plan. With his lackey left in the Senate to ensure his affairs and interests were properly safeguarded, Caesar would be free to launch a conquest of his life and attain a name and glory for himself. He also offered Cicero a post under his command, an offer Cicero refused (obviously!). Nonetheless, Caesar continued to keep Cicero under his watchful eyes while dealing with him only at arm’s length. Meanwhile, Clodius has proven himself ever more loyal and effective by enacting a series of laws designed to promote the positive public image of Caesar in Rome. Cicero’s attempt to challenge the law came to naught (yet again). Even more so, in a twist of fate, Clodius led the Senate in the persecution of Cicero and succeeded in exiling the orator from Rome. Cicero suddenly found himself losing everything he held dear – his fame, glory, livelihood and possession. His villa was burnt down by angry mobs. His family was scattered. Clodius the Pleb had finally got his sweet revenge!
Other leaders of the Senate soon found themselves in chaos caused by Clodius’ mischief. Indeed, Caesar’s plan was to prevent the Optimates (Caesar’s opposition in the Senate) from coming together in his absence. In his long absence in Gaul, he never realised what kind of monster he had unleashed upon Rome. Tired of being a tool of Caesar, Clodius set out to cause havoc on the streets of Rome, ordering the confiscation and burning of several villas on the consecrated ground of high-ranking senators. Even Pompey found himself under attack by Clodius’ mob that on one occasion he was forced to barricade himself inside his house! The incident was so serious that Julia, Pompey’s wife and Caesar’s daughter, suffered a shock and miscarried as a result.
The Appian Way where Clodius was murdered
With Cicero’s return to Rome in 57 BC under Pompey’s protection, the two of them joined forces against Clodius. In this, they were joined by a new ally, Milo, another enemy of Clodius and a street ruffian just like Clodius. The two ruffians engaged in daily fighting and Rome was plunged into anarchy. Gang-warfare plagued the streets of Rome, as good men and women feared even to come out in the daylight. The sight of blood was common as Rome became a big “blood bath”. The climax came in 52 BC when Milo and Clodius’ mobs engaged in yet another gang-war, where Clodius was murdered. In response, Clodius’ followers burnt his body in the Senate House, which was subsequently burnt down. This extreme violence caused the Senate to elect Pompey as sole Consul and declare “martial law”.
At this perilous juncture, the fate of the Republic is sealed. With Caesar having completed his conquest of Gaul, it was too late for the Senators in Rome to work together to stop him, long divided as they were by Clodius. This combined with Caesar’s popularity among the people made the situation worse. In 49 BC, Caesar crossed the Rubicon to declare himself master of Rome.

In the end, the end of the Republic can be attributed to one simple incident - The Bona Dea Scandal of 62 BC. That a man could rise to power from his act of sacrilege was indeed paradoxical. Nonetheless, Clodius’ rise to power plunged the affairs of the Republic into chaos, and allowed Caesar to roam free in Gaul and strengthened his power base. Without Clodius’ aid, Caesar’s adversaries might have proven a sufficient check on Caesar’s power and might have prevented that fateful crossing of the Rubicon.

ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:

แสดงความคิดเห็น